My gut is the idea I sketched here for AU at least (have the installer make a symlink or perhaps complete copy with modified ist of ponent from ponent and have the code use BundleName) is the way I would attack it. So it's all a bit tedious and hard to test. Or you need to make ponent a symlink to ponent and have the AU check on module name (which is probably easiest but has ramifications in the installer) but the symlink probably won't change the bundle name since that comes from ist. How to Route a REAKTOR 5 Sequencer to a Plug-in in Ableton Live - YouTube 0:00 / 4:14 How to Route a REAKTOR 5 Sequencer to a Plug-in in Ableton Live NI Support - EN 30. So this is a bit tedious - you need another pipeline which rebuilds the ponent as ponent in premake, in the scripts, and so on, and then just does the necessary change. dlls are there but i cant get it to be showing in m. whats further confusing is that while my plug ins folder is program files (x86) the native instruments plug ins are stored in the other program files folder, yet they still show up in my plug ins in ableton. ) but on mac and vst3 you have no such luck in the current code base. Hi guys, I just installed Reaktor 5 on my PC in the right location where my vst folder is and all. However ableton is only recognizing all of my native instruments plugins with the single exception of reaktor. Unfortunately as Oscillot users have found out despite intense effort from the developers - that strategy is a house of cards. If (strstr(path, "_fx") || strstr(path, "_FX")) Instead Ableton opted for a low level IDE theoretically capable of doing nearly everything, with the idea that MAX users could build the high level Reaktor style functional 'blocks', inside Max, inside of Ableton. GetModuleFileName((HMODULE)hInstance, path, 1024)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |